Over the past decade, deep learning has become the gold standard for automatic medical image segmentation. Every segmentation task has an underlying uncertainty due to image resolution, annotation protocol, etc. Therefore, a number of methods and metrics have been proposed to quantify the uncertainty of neural networks mostly based on Bayesian deep learning, ensemble learning methods or output probability calibration. The aim of our research is to assess how reliable the different uncertainty metrics found in the literature are. We propose a quantitative and statistical comparison of uncertainty measures based on the relevance of the uncertainty map to predict misclassification. Four uncertainty metrics were compared over a set of 144 models. The application studied is the segmentation of the lumen and vessel wall of carotid arteries based on multiple sequences of magnetic resonance (MR) images in multi-center data.